Songs of Silence - Nathan Essay Example for Free

Songs of Silence Nathan Essay Use the character Nathan to discuss the ways in which Forbes presents the theme of Silence.  In the book ‘Songs of Silence’, the character Nathan is man of simple pleasures. His kind of silence as pertaining to the book was one of never knowing what to expect or what his true intentions were. It was a silence of pure evil yet with purposeful good intentions. This is seen when he seeks revenge after his kite was broken by his brother earlier that day. Before going to bed, he performed his bedtime ritual of kneeling by his bedside and saying his prayers then proceeded to his older brother, Tony, and poked him in the eye and without a word went to bed an fell asleep. That action was unexpected but well deserved. Nathan was very observant. He was also a determined young man. It is seen in the way he would handle negotiations with his siblings. It was almost like you would have to give into his demands because it was his way or the highway, take it or leave it, that type of thing. So if it was a situation where you needed something from him you would then have to meet the requirements of payment or not have whatever it is taken care of and that would be his final answer. You could say he was a stubborn person but he stood up for what he felt he believed in. This is also seen in his later years as an adult. As a security guard he abided by the rules and stood up for what was right. He didn’t allow the thought of material things cloud the duties he had to fulfill, and in doing this he lost a leg but was quite content in the down to earth life style he lived after settling a generous financial deal. For Nathan the need for a companion was never at all necessary. He needed only himself. He found self-fulfillment of being satisfied with what he had and had no need for anything more. Forbes drew a reference to this by stating, â€Å"If bone could suffice, there was no need for flesh,† (page: 31 fourth paragraph). That statement alone shows us how content yet tight Nathan was. Tight in the sense that when he was owed something he would make sure of it that he got repaid. Also, when it came to money he only spent what it is he knew he needed. Other than that the money would forever stay in his pocket. There were many ‘types’ of silence interpreted in the book ‘Songs of Silence’. Nathan’s silence in particular was one which brought about question. Why was he so quiet all the time? Was something troubling him that he had to take a great deal of time to figure it out? Or was it because he had no interest in earthly pleasures. In conclusion, Curdella Forbes uses Nathan’s silence to epitomize self-content; being happy with the company of one’s self.

war :: essays research papers

The cries of joy were deafening as people gathered in the streets. People ran around hugging and kissing strangers. In a sense, the news was totally unexpected. Japan had just surrendered. VJ Day, as it is now called, produced great celebration. Everyone was relieved that we would not have to endure a bloody invasion of Japan. We would not have to sacrifice 200,000 more men to end the war. During the war, millions of lives were put on hold. Now that the war is over, people could start living their lives again. "The misery is behind us," they would say. "We have won the war." In reality, though, there are no winners in war; only losers. Even the "winners" are actually losers. Both sides in any conflict suffer losses. The question is not who won the most, but who lost the least. The "winners" of WWII suffered staggering losses. Even the U.S., which did not have its own homeland ravaged by the war, suffered great losses. Besides the $360 billion price tag ($3,578 billion in today’s dollars), there were 292,131 Americans killed (not to mention the 115,185 "non-battle deaths"). There were also 670,846 Americans wounded. This, of course, does not take into account the emotional toll of shattered lives and marriages. Yes, we "won" because we survived the war declared on us by Japan and Germany. Yes, we "won" because we saved the world from plummeting into a very dark and desperate era. Yes, we "won" because we saved over 100 million people from certain death and several hundred million people from oppression and torture. If Japan and Germany had not been defeated, the losses to America (and the rest of the world) would have been far more substantial. So, in comparison, we did "win." Don’t get me wrong; I’m not an anti-war protestor. I feel there is a definite need for a strong national defense. I feel it is important for our country to be able to defend herself. I also believe that there is the unfortunate need for the U.S. to defend the oppressed and defenseless of the world. Although I don’t like the U.S. being the guardian of the world, there is a moral obligation to protect the defenseless when there is wholesale genocide and torture taking place. Of course, history has shown us there is a right way and a wrong way to intervene in foreign problems. The reason I bring this up is because we all have our own private "wars.

George

Both cases had resulted in the growing number of third parties which have a legal right to sue auditor for negligence. In other word, auditor's liability to third parties has Increased. The defendants had all relied on the accounts In taking and calculating the price of shares in the knitwear company. In the case of Thomas Ltd. , Ð ²?56,100; in the case of Goode, E,500; and, in the case of Gordon, El ,500. Thomas Limited purchased 16,000 ordinary shares in Kinkier in November 1973 which shares were formerly held by a Mr. Saurian, a director of Kinkier. That purchase was at E;10 per share.In addition Thomas purchased a fresh Issue of Kinkier shares, namely 15,000 at El ;50 per share. It Is pleaded for all three pursuers that in making these purchases they relied upon balance sheets and accounts prepared and audited by the defenders. Thomas, they also plead that they relied upon advice given by Mr. Mainframe at meetings held prior to the conclusion of the agreement to purchase the 31, 000 shares. It is said that the audited accounts prepared by the defenders for years prior to 1975 had been highly misleading and inaccurate. Mr. Mainframe, acted negligently and Incompetently In the preparation and auditing of Skinner's accounts.Instead of trading profitably the said Kinkier Knitwear Limited had in fact been trading at a loss both before and after the purchase of the said shares, figures which were of particular significance to Thomas were those of the trading profits and losses. This failure was, in my view, because of slack and careless auditing methods. The pursuers averred-?†The defenders completely failed to make any check on the said Kinkier Knitwear Limiter's system of tock control or the basis of valuation of the stock. As a result the stock figures provided In said accounts were seriously Inaccurate. â€Å"For some years the defenders had failed to carry out normal checks of credit and debit balances. The defenders had completely failed to make prov ision in said accounts for a doubtful debt reserve which they ought to have done. They failed to carry out the normal checks to establish that debts stated by the Company to be due were in fact due as any competent auditors would have done before certifying the said accounts. Competent auditors making the appropriate checks In carrying out an audit of the said Kinkier Knitwear Limited and preparing said accounts would have discovered these inaccuracies and noted them in said accounts.The figure could well have been much higher because a number of old debts found to be still on the books when the check was made in 1976 or 1977 did not carry the date when they were incurred. The figure of E,662 Is, therefore, a minimum. I have the Impression from the fact that Mr. Mainframe made no attempt to circularities any debtors for the 1973 audit or even to go ay be due more to good luck than to good Judgment on his part. I am therefore satisfied that the accounts to 31st March 1973 were neglig ently prepared by the defenders and negligently audited by Mr. Mainframe.When weighed against what was said by the pursuers' witnesses, and accepted by me, to be the methods of an auditor exercising reasonable care and skill his methods were sadly wanting. =>Len the end of the day these Justifications came down to this that the shareholders, to whom his firm owed certain duties as auditors, were all directors and in particular to the inconsideration that he was a close personal friend of Mr. Lennox whom he had known since childhood and not only trusted him but also trusted other staff of the company.I consider that it follows and that it should now be regarded as settled that if someone possessed of a special skill undertakes, quite irrespective of contract, to apply that skill for the assistance of another person who relies on such skill, a duty of care will arise. =>=>He knew that auditors' certificates, when they were â€Å"clean† certificates, were commonly relied on by s hareholders, potential investors, and potential lenders.In the whole circumstances I consider that Mr. Mainframe should have foreseen before he certified the 1973 accounts that these accounts might be relied on by a potential investor for the purpose of deciding whether or not to invest. To these, the latest audited accounts of the company would be of very great importance in influencing them whether or not to invest and at what price. L, therefore, consider that in respect of Thomas and Mr. Gordon, both being in the class of persons who were potential investors, Mr. Mainframe owed a prima facie duty of care in the auditing of the 1973 accounts.

Capital Punishment As Deterrent Essay - 446 Words

I find no conclusive evidence to support the view that the death penalty is or is not an effective deterrent in controlling crime. Opponents of capital punishment argue that it is not a deterrent, because in some states where capital punishment is allowed the crime rate goes up. Others argue that capital punishment deters violent crime, though it is difficult to provide numerical evidence. Dozens of studies have examined the relationship between murder and the death penalty comparing murder rates in areas with the death penalty to those in areas without the death penalty. Murder rates have been examined when the death penalty was added or removed in various areas and countries. None of these studies establish that the death penalty†¦show more content†¦Studies have suggested that the death penalty is no more effective than imprisonment in deterring others from committing violent crime. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;General deterrence is the idea that punishing an offender deters others from committing similar crimes. Specific deterrence refers to the fact that executing a known offender prevents that person from killing again, deterring at least that specific offender. Certainly, capital punishment will not deter all crime. Evidence suggests that psychotic and deranged killers, members of organized crime, and street gangs do not appear to be deterred from committing acts of murder by the implementation of capital punishment. A person who is irrational or wants to commit a murder will do so whether capital punishment exists or not. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Homicides are an act of passion, an impulsive act committed under tremendous stress and/or the influence of alcohol or drugs by individuals prone to aggressive, impulsive behavior. These people do not make rational calculations of pain and gain at the time of their acts. There are, of course, some carefully planned, premeditated murders. However, people committing these murders usually do not expect to be caught. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;For deterrence to work, the potential offender must see the penalty as a significant threat. But some people commit murder as a way ofShow MoreRelatedIs Capital Punishment A Deterrent?1138 Words   |  5 Pagesteaching regarding capital punishment present some challenges for me. The teaching references and explains that â€Å"since punishment involves the deliberate infliction of evil on another, it is always in need of justification† (McKenna, 12). The three traditional justifications for capital punishment include retribution, deterrence, and reform (McKenna, 12). Considering these justifications, the teaching explains that none of these are viable reasons for enacting capital punishment. Reform as a justificationRead MoreCapital Punishment : A Deterrent Effect971 Words   |  4 Pagespenalty has significant deterrent effects, supporting the use of capital punishment. In particular, American constitutional legal scholars Cass R Sunstein and Adrien Vermeule presented their 2005 study, â€Å"Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? The Relevance of Life-Life Tradeoffs,† which supports the notion of capital punishment as a deterrent. Sunstein and Vermeule’s study specifically presents the argument of the morality behind the death penalty’s significant deterrent effect, in light of recentRead MoreCapital Punishment As A Deterrent Of Crime1354 Words   |  6 PagesCapital punishment as a Deterrent to Crime Is it ethically wrong to execute offenders after they have carried out a certain horrendous crime? Two sisters vanished while strolling home from a shopping center in a calm suburb of Washington, and a far reaching inquiry yielded nothing. As months swung to years, and after that decades, any desires for realizing what happened to the young ladies dwindled. Law enforcement authorities vowed to work to pursue each individual who was included in the crimeRead More Capital Punishment Is A Deterrent To Crime Essay1202 Words   |  5 Pages Capital Punishment has ended the lives of criminals for centuries. People have debated whether the government should have the power to decide one person’s life. On one side, people think the government does not have the right to play God as well as believe that the death penalty is simply unethical. Forty-eight percent of a half sample survey stated that life imprisonment was a better punishment for murder while forty-seven percent stated t hat capital punishment was a better punishment (Newport)Read MoreCapital Punishment : A Deterrent Effect On Crime Essay2996 Words   |  12 Pages Does the Death Penalty Have Any Deterrent Effect on Crime Name Institution Abstract The question of the death penalty has been subject to heated debate on if it serves in deterring criminal activities. Through exploration into findings of several studies, it would be possible to validate whether capital punishment has a deterrent effect on crimes. Various studies are explored with the objective of understanding which side of the debate is stronger. The findings of this studyRead MoreCapital Punishment : A Deterrent Effect On Crime Essay2970 Words   |  12 PagesWhether the Death Penalty Has Any Real Deterrent Effect on Crime Name Institution Abstract The question of capital punishment has been stirring heated debate in regards to whether it indeed does or doesn’t deter criminal activities. By exploring findings from various studies, this paper aims at validating whether death penalty has a deterrent effect on crimes. Various studies are explored with the objective of understanding which side of the debate is stronger. The findings of thisRead MoreIs Capital Punishment An Effective And Humane Deterrent1978 Words   |  8 PagesIs Capital Punishment an effective and humane deterrent for crime? Capital punishment has been around for generations and it has been a controversial topic. The viewpoint in America comes from our ancestors in the United Kingdom and has evolved into the current issue of its constitutionality. Capital punishment has proved to be effective in its ability to achieve retribution for certain crimes and maintain public order. Deterrence has always been a popular reason for keeping the death pen alty, butRead MoreThe History of Capital Punishment as a Deterrent to Crime Essay2614 Words   |  11 Pagesconcerning capital punishment, or the death penalty. Through the passing of time, our society castigates transgressors with the death penalty. Many nations through time have decided to enact this harsh treatment. In the United States alone, the federal government has persevered to reinforce people to death (Marzillo 10). According to Wikipedia Encyclopedia, â€Å"Capital Punishment is the execution of a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense.† Over the centuries capital punishment has beenRead More Capital Punishment is Not an Effective Crime Deterrent Essay1483 Words   |  6 PagesWhile Capital Punishment has been one of the most feared things of our time, it is still being questioned if it is unconstitutional. The Death Penalty is being enforced in more than 100 countries in the world and are usually used in politically-related cases. Although it has been the case in many countries throughout the world it has been said that the Death Penalty is cruel and unusual punishment which is a direct violation to the Bill of Rights. Capital Punishment is a certainRead MoreIs Capital Punishment a Deterrent? Murder Rates Compared with Execution Rates in Texas, and on a National Level1486 Words   |  6 PagesIB Math Studies IA Is Capital Punishment a Deterrent? | Murder Rates compared with Execution Rates in Texas, and on a National Level | | The United States of America is one of the only democratic countries that still use capital punishment. This has raised a rather extensive debate, especially over the last 4 decades. I became interested in this issue in 2011 after the controversy surrounding the execution of Troy Davis, and the issue has remained. In my research, one argument